Re: Bug#339255: acknowledged by developer (Bug#339255: fixed in quantlib 0.3.11-2)

[Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> 
> severity 339255 normal
> tags 339255 + wontfix
> retitle 339255 "QuantLib has now been rebuilt with g++-4_4.0.2-4"
> thanks
> 
> On 18 November 2005 at 09:15, Matthias Klose wrote:
> | reopen 339255
> | thanks
> |
> | Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> | >  quantlib (0.3.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
> | >  .
> | >    * Rebuilt with new g++ for libstdc++ allocator transition (Closes: #339255)
> | 
> | The library package was not renamed. It's no reason, that you _can_
> | rebuild all other packages. 
> 
> But that is silly.

no, I tried to explain, that it is not.

> Forcing a renaming is a make-work project for everybody.

that's unfortunate, but not an argument.

> By this evening, the two depedents of the package will have been
> uploaded, and the mt_alloc will be _gone_ everywhere QuantLib has source in
> Debian.  So a closed bug as far as I am concerned,
> 
> | Partial upgrades will be still broken.
> 
> Maybe right in theory but wrong in practice as QuantLib was _already blocked
> for 24 days by boost_ so there can't be a partial upgrade. Cannot happen.
> 
> I really think I will close this once the two dependents are uploaded.

I'm going to upload a NMU which renames the library package, if you
think that it's too much work. You don't need to upload the dependent
packages, ask for binNMU's instead on debian-release.

  Matthias