Re: xerces upgrade/transition
Jay Berkenbilt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I think libxml-xerces-perl is pretty much dead upstream, and there
> are better perl XML options, so I see no reason to keep xerces25
> around just to support that. If a version comes out that works with
> 2.7.0, I'll continue to package it. Hopefully this issue will
> disappear once 3.0 comes out.
I spoke too soon....there is a libxml-xerces-perl that works with
xerces 2.6.0 now. Maybe we can live with two versions, so I'll be
able to drop xerces25. We'll see. I think it would be tolerable to
have xerces26 and xerces27 but not to have xerces25.