[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: #317475 related bugs still valid?

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 03:09:13AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi there.
> Quite a few RC bugs against packages exist that refer to #317475
> as possible cause for FTBFS on m68k. AFAIK this could be fixed with
> gcc 4.0.2. How should this be tested? Will you just requeue them
> or should we do manual builds on crest? Or is the bug known to not
> be fixed at all?

I've queued them up and I'll close the bugs as they get built or not as



Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: