Steve Langasek wrote: > > bzip > > 8/10 days old > > chmlib > > 3/10 days old > > courier > > too young > > gxine > > too young > > squid > > too young > > sqwebmail > > too young > > Feel free to add urgent hints for any of these. None of them are that serious holes, IRC. > > ntp > > 177 days old > > 3 RC bugs, max 98 days old, none with responses from maintainers > > recommend removal from testing (and/or debian) > > Are these different security bugs than the ones already fixed via > proposed-updates? Thanks, you're right it's not vulnerable. > > openmotif > > 106 days old > > non-free package, still missing s390 build > > (I tried and failed to build this on raptor, machine is too > > unstable.) > > This package really doesn't appear to have the necessary baseline > support from porters and/or the maintainer to let us keep it around. > There's a total of one package in testing still depending on openmotif; > I think we should give the arb maintainer a shot at fixing it, and then > drop it from testing if he doesn't get anywhere. Agreed, although I think you might as well let the maintainers of ida and motv have a crack at it too. > > python2.1 > > alpha build succeeded 2 weeks ago but gone missing > > mips, mipsel, powerpc builds ditto > > blocked by gmp > > python2.2 > > FTBFS m68k (ICE) > > FTBFS hppa > > blocked by gmp > > No hope that we can get rid of these yet...? Very little depends on python2.1. python2.2 has a bit more stuff but certianly not too much that filing some RC bugs and dropping it might not be the easiest way to fix this issue. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature