On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 02:43:31PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:58:27AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > When is the first stable update planned to be released? > > > > > > I would like to update sarge before September, but haven't heard > > > back from ftpmaster yet whether this would be possible. > > > > In that case, given that timeline, and given that testing is going to > > be frozen at 1.37-2sarge1 for several weeks, could you arrange an > > override so that 1.37-2sarge-2 can get into stable-proposed-updates? > I have no power over the archive. > Maybe Steve or Colin can help. Sorry, we don't have any more access to override katie's version constraints than you do. There's been discussion about whether uploads to s-p-u should have the same effect of back-propagating to t-p-u and unstable that stable-security does, but I don't think any real conclusion has been reached yet. The other option would be to upload a version of e2fsprogs built against glibc 2.3.2 to testing-proposed-updates, allow it to be installed, and then upload to stable as well. Not that I'm keen on letting large updates in through t-p-u, but given that these are important fixes that testing is also missing, it seems reasonable to try. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature