[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

FAM transition unnecessary?



Looking at /usr/include/fam.h (the only FAM header file), it appears to
provide a pure C interface only.  The library has an awful lot of C++
symbols, but it seems clear that nobody's supposed to be linking to them.

Changing the name is reasonable anyway, but it looks like it might be safe
for it to Provides: libfam0c102, which would save a fair amount of entanglement
if I'm right.

-- 
This space intentionally left blank.



Reply to: