Re: wanna-build only knows about older versions?
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 03:02:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 11:49:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Steve Langasek:
>
> > > Of course security support is essential for released architectures,
>
> > I don't think this is the case. Apparently, we have successfully
> > without security support, therefore it cannot be "essential".
>
> This sentence no verb. In addition, this sentence big troll. Can we please
> stop playing this little game of implying that the people involved think
> it's somehow acceptable to not have security support for stable?
If that's the case, why do the people involved tolerate no security
support for stable being available for more than a month now?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
Reply to: