Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 22:20:22 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050605202022.GB653@saruman.uio.no>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87mzq4sidm.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de>
References: <20050605151753.GA25394@soften.ktu.lt> <[🔎] 20050605152238.GC26131@saruman.uio.no> <[🔎] 87mzq4sidm.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de>

[Joerg Jaspert]
> Sarge is closed, so you are out of luck.

Actually, the users with that hardware is out of luck.  I'm happy, as
I got hardware already handled by discover1-data in sarge.

Oh, well.  To bad.  Somebody elses problem, I guess.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?
  - From: Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li>

References:
- Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?
  - From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Please accept tinyhoneypot into sarge
Next by Date: Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?
Previous by thread: Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?
Next by thread: Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread