On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:07:00PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > please respect reply-to: - thanks. > On Sunday 29 May 2005 06:57, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Thanks to some fancy last-minute archive work by James Troup, we now have a > > solution that lets us get security-fixed kernels into sarge r0 (instead of > > just into security.d.o) without running into GPL problems with > > debian-installer. > Great, thanks! > (But) AFAIUI, fai-kernels also has to be rebuild now. (It's i386 only at the > moment.) > This means it needs a new upload, as the build depends in the control file has > to be changed from kernel-tree-2.6.8-15 and kernel-tree-2.4.27-8 to -16 and > -10. > Or do I misunderstand something ? If you are build-depending on kernel-tree-2.6.8-15 and kernel-tree-2.4.27-8, this means that you are ensuring in your debian/rules that you get those exact patch levels of the tree, right? In that case, there is no license requirement that you rebuild against the latest trees; it would be appreciated if you did so in order to remove one more TODO item from the security team's list. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature