Re: Bug#309275: libgd-perl not in sarge?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 16-05-2005 22:06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:03:28PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> * libgd-noxpm-perl (built from exact same source) is in sarge.
>
>
> Eh, why aren't both packages actually built from the same source package
> then? If they are two variants of the same package, they should be built
> from the same source.
Because build-dependencies are not equal.
> Since both packages are obsolete though, I don't think it's worth fixing
> this now. Fwiw, I couldn't find any reverse depends on either of those
> packages, not even in unstable, so why have these two packages in sarge
> anyway?
How did you check?
A quick look using aptitude interactively seems to show that the
following packages depend, require or suggest libgd-perl:
ipac-ng
diablo
libtemplate-perl
remstats
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCil/3n7DbMsAkQLgRAmrtAJsGv8ypfUx/YTl8qq06Qz83oCupGgCdEVNn
KiFeffaYUjarjEpOWtb5V+M=
=uvZ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: