[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please accept squid_2.5.9-9 in sarge



Hi Luigi,

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 07:58:07PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:

> as suggested by Frank Lichtenheld, I uploaded a new version of squid
> with just two patches fixing critical bugs:

> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE9-dns_query

> security issue with DNS response spoofing

> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE9-2GB_assert

> assertion failure while storing objects on disk

Approved, thanks.

> As a side note, I'd like to point out that Bug #305605, listed in the RC
> report, while being actually 'grave', applies only to woody and, thus,
> could be tagged 'sarge-ignore'. 

This bug is already tagged 'woody'; there is no reason to tag it
'sarge-ignore', as it is already excluded from the RC count for sarge.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: