Re: Considering approx and syslog-ocaml inclusion in sarge ?
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:53:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:04:14AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Would it be meaningfull to include approx and syslog-ocaml in sarge ? The only
> > reason they didn't make it before the freeze was that i was travelling and
> > didn't detect that syslog-ocaml was mishandling the non-native arches case.
>
> > I have been using approx for over two month now daily, and it works fine, and
> > as said, it is not a package that has any reverse-dependencies or something.
>
> > The only remaining problem is for the m68k autobuilder to pick up the
> > syslog-ocaml build, and the m68k, mips and ia64 autobuilders to pick up the
> > approx builds, which should hopefully happen any day now.
>
> Sarge is now closed for new packages. These are simply too low of a
> priority, and there are too many other demands on the release team's time --
> particularly, the RC bug count which isn't dropping fast enough.
I can't argue with that, but in the event that apt-proxy v2 doesn't
make it into sarge, you might consider approx as a migration path for
otherwise-orphaned users of apt-proxy v1 (that was my original
motivation for writing it).
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
Reply to: