Linda 0.3.14 in sarge?
Hi,
I've been quietly hacking in my cave on Linda 0.3.14, and I am
close to uploading it, however, I was wondering if I have any chance
other than none and Buckley's of getting it into sarge? Clagged below
is the changelog for 0.3.14 as it stands, with the proviso that it
will change slightly before I upload 0.3.14, since I have one more bug
to fix.
linda (0.3.14) unstable; urgency=medium
* Manual Page:
- Actually run a spell checker over it. (*blush*)
- Mention types overrides under OVERRIDES.
* Error printing:
- Complain if the tag does not exist in the data file.
* Libchecks:
- Print out the filename of the registered checks at debug level 4.
* Packaging:
- Update long Description. (Closes: #304325) (thanks, Emanuele Rocca)
- Append a parsed en.po to linda.pot. (Closes: #305059)
* Testsuite:
- Call linda with -D in the endtoend tests.
- Sneakily chown unpacked tests to nobody:nobody so we can build as root.
(Closes: #307183)
* Output:
- Put strings grabbed from gettext into unicode strings encoded in the
right charset. (Closes: #306047)
* Figlet Output:
- Actually make it work by correcting a typo in bootstrap.
* BinaryCheck:
- Add [-_] to the start of checking if a package name is considered to be
debug, and smush the checks that are affected by debug together.
(Closes: #305930)
- Correct the short description of stripped-binary-not.
- Rewrite the .note and .comment check to not be so dumb.
- Don't complain about no depends line if the package contains any ELF
relocatables. (Closes: #308137)
* ChangelockCheck:
- Sprinkle in a little re.compile().
* LibraryCheck:
- First attempt to check shlibs control files.
-- Steve Kowalik <stevenk@debian.org> Wed, 11 May 2005 18:55:05 +1000
Cheers,
--
Steve
"...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user'
as meaning someone who's only ever written one device driver." -- Daniel Pead
Reply to: