[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re-adding package 'symlinks' to Sarge ?



On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:20:37AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:23:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:

> > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:04:55PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > I have NMUed 'symlinks' to fix bug #273338 (the patch is in the
> > > bug log). It is now rebuilt on all architectures.

> > > Would you consider reincluding this package in sarge, given it was
> > > in woody ?

> > Do you actively use this tool?  In fixing symlinks' reverse-dependencies so
> > that it could be removed, I found that most uses of symlinks could be
> > replaced with a line or two of shell code; but if you have use for it, I
> > have no problem re-adding it.

> Yes I do.

Ok, approved then.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: