Re: Accepted gettext 0.14.1-11 (i386 source all)
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > So: How a package which may not be installed reached testing?
> > Does this breakage mean that the current checks made by the testing
> > scripts are not enough?
>
> I didn't mention testing at all. Nothing is broken in testing.
I am really puzzled now. Why gettext 0.14.1-11 for testing-proposed-updates
FTBFS on mipsel, then?
Are uploads for testing-proposed-updates build on a sarge chroot or not?
I initially fixed Bug#307749 in unstable, and it FTBFS in a lot of
architectures, so I said:
> [ Hmm, I wish autobuilders ran sarge for packages that are going to be part
> of sarge, at least during the freeze ].
and Steve replied:
> Well, if you'd care to upload getext 0.14.1-11 to testing-proposed-updates,
> that can be arranged :)
I interpreted that in the sense that uploads for testing-proposed-updates
are already built on a sarge chroot, but now I'm not sure, as you say
"Nothing is broken in testing".
See why I am so confused?
Reply to: