[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: GNOME packages sarge status



On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:55:40PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:33:21PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mercredi 04 mai 2005 ? 08:26 -0300, Gustavo R. Montesino a ?crit :
> > > > + libgnomedb 1.2.1-2 -> 1.2.1-3
> > > >         fixes documentation and schemas locations (#304131, #304959)
> > > 
> > > It would be great if this one could enter sarge, the wrong path made
> > > the package uninstallable to some people.

> > This is true, but Vorlon pointed out that the gconf schemas still lie
> > in /etc instead of /usr/share. Could you prepare another upload fixing
> > this as well?

> Eh, do you really think such a big change like moving the gconf data
> store from /etc to /usr/share is a good move now we're frozen? I thought
> this didn't happen before because of the destableizing effects it will
> have in testing, and I don't think it's good timing at all to have this
> change in sarge at this stage.

It's an FHS violation, gconf correctly searches both paths, and I'm
personally tired of having gconf monopolize my root partition.  Yes, I think
this is a good move, even if we're frozen. :)

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: