On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 09:41:53PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > How strongly do you feel about having only one version of xerces in > sarge? If we have only one version, having it be xerces25 is > definitely the easiest way to achieve that. Supporting two versions of a library in stable is not unreasonable. It's the "three or more" scenario we have currently that bothers me. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature