Ce jour Wed, 01 Dec 2004, Steve Langasek a dit: > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:54:29AM -0500, simon@nuit.ca wrote: > > been gone since last saturday, but i packed up the new quik, and like i > > said on d-devel a little while ago, it's got some new useful features. i > > was expecting to see it in an apt-cache show quik, but it's not in my > > copy of the package database. i thought it might have gotten uploaded > > by now... i'm a bit puzzled. > > > but anyway, i was asked to email this list about the update, and getting > > this new quik into sarge. > > > so here i am, doing that. is there any objection to this? > > You should absolutely not be uploading new upstream versions of packages to > testing-proposed-updates, which seems to be what your subject line implies. sorry, didn't mean to have it seem that way, but no, i'm not proposing that at all. just the upload to unstable. > If you're aiming to have this new upstream release in sarge, it's fine for > it to be uploaded to unstable. Whether or not it's accepted into testing > can only be decided once the release team has an opportunity to review the > source (i.e., after the package is in unstable). np. thank you. > -- > Steve Langasek > postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature