On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 05:49:49PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> libpqxx should now be ready to move into testing, but it requires a
> manual hint to do so.
Why did the i386 package build a libpqxx-2.4.1 binary package, instead of a
libpqxx-2.4.0 binary like all of the other archs? This looks very wrong,
and almost certainly needs to be resolved in the source package before it's
eligible for testing.
At a minimum, the stale binary packages need to be gotten rid of before
libpqxx is eligible for testing:
$ grep-excuses libpqxx
libpqxx (2.3.0-3 to 2.4.1-1)
Maintainer: Roger Leigh
10 days old (needed 10 days)
out of date on i386: libpqxx-2.4.0 (from 2.4.0-2)
Not considered
and, once that's fixed, I don't see anything else here that requires a hint.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature