Re: Security in sarge
vorlon@debian.org wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:12:15PM +0200, Tobias Stefan Richter wrote:
> > > rlpr is in the same state as pavuk above.
>
> > I didn't look into pavuk, but rlpr has as far as I see no weird state.
>
> You seem to be right, though previous attempts to cleanly remove this
> package from testing had failed.
>
> > The latest Debian version is from the above DSA (2.02-7woody1), which
> > could savely be included in sarge. Upstream has 2.05, though.
> > I would not like to see it removed.
>
> Are you willing to maintain the package yourself?
I'd be willing, but I'm not a DD (yet).
I am an advanced user and did some private packaging before, but didn't
find anything useful and unmaintained to help with. So if anyone would
sponsor me maintaining rlpr, I could and would help out.
On the other hand rlpr isn't officially ophaned, maybe a DD would pick
this rather small package up, if that was the case. Would be a quicker move.
Bye,
Tobias
Reply to: