On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:20:56AM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: > It would appear that doc++ was incorrectly removed from both testing and > unstable as it was thought that it was obsoleted by a Java documentation > package, however doc++ was also an important Build-Depends for a number of > packages in sarge (See #265273 for history): > dancer-xml > dlisp > dmachinemon > fwbuilder > libdshconfig > libfwbuilder > openh323 > pwlib > I have prepared a NMU of doc++ (from snapshot.debian.net), loaded into > incoming and would request that it be processed though the queue quickly and > be replaced back into sarge. Actually, someone else already beat you to NMUing, but it is sitting in the NEW queue nevertheless. It just needs to have an ftpmaster approve it. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature