[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libqt3-compat-headers, noteedit, and arm



On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 10:59:48AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>   I've been monitoring the status of noteedit in unstable and testing.  As
> Thomas Bushnell pointed out recently on this list, it would be Very Good if
> noteedit 2.7.1 could get into testing; in fact, I uploaded 2.7.1 to
> testing-proposed-updates over a week ago in order to help this process along.

>   However, now I'm getting periodic reject mails from dinstall about autobuilt
> noteedit packages, due to the fact that noteedit is out of date on several
> architectures in unstable.

I don't see how out-of-date packages in unstable would be causing you to
get reject mails.  Reject mails are generated by broken uploads; broken
uploads might cause packages to be out of date, but packages being out
of date don't cause reject emails.

The rest of your analysis looks correct.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: