On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 01:07:09PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Steve Langasek wrote: > > There's a steadily increasing buzz about the status of the sarge > > release, now that the new installer is on the home stretch. The release > > team has been hard at work on finalizing a viable release schedule, but > > it will take a little more time yet before that's ready to be announced. > > In the meantime, we do need to announce the first stage of the sarge > > freeze. > > 31 July Hard-freeze of base+standard > Does this mean I should use urgency=high for a base-files upload > which says 3.1 in /etc/debian_version, or should I upload that > to testing-proposed-updates instead? I'm comfortable with either, as long as you use your best judgement when deciding what to include in this upload. If you have any doubts, uploading to testing-proposed-updates ensures that it will be reviewed before it's included in sarge. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature