On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 07:08:24AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: > At Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:23:32 +0200, > Andreas Metzler wrote: > > * contrary to the last transition (libcupsys2 -> libcupsys-2gnutls10) > > different versions of gnutls and gcrypt can co-exist in the archive. > > Of course the last transition was as bad as possible, so "smoother" is > > not necessarily "smooth enough". > OK, I and Sebastien took worst method. X-( > I didn't want to change libcupsys2 name, but we did... > Must I revert the package name to libcupsys2? Or provide new package, > libcupsys2-gnutls11? > I really hate and discourage last transition. I want true best solution > if we start to transit at now. The previous cupsys transition was painful because at the time, gcrypt7 did not have versioned symbols. For this upcoming transition, there should no longer be a need to rename the cupsys library package. Therefore, in spite of its ugliness, the best approach from a release standpoint is to keep the libcupsys2-gnutls10 package name. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature