On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 03:10:18AM +0300, Martin-?ric Racine wrote: > On Sun, 23 May 2004, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Le dim, 23/05/2004 ? 01:36 +0300, Martin-?ric Racine a ?crit : > > > Today, Rhythmbox 0.8.4 entered unstable, with rather unpleasant > > > consequences > > rhythmbox is not related to gnome2.6 at all, > That's incorrect. Configuration of the audio sink used by Rhythmbox requires > gnome-media 2.6.x, which is definitely a part of GNOME 2.6. In which case it sounds like rhythmbox should have a versioned recommends on the appropriate component of gnome 2.6, and that's it. > Seb: I realize you're anxious to get GNOME 2.6 into unstable, but Rhythmbox > proved that you want to go too far too fast. Soon, but not now. Why do you think the above is a general problem that needs to be solved Gnome-wide as part of the 2.6 transition, rather than just a packaging bug in rhythmbox? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> Don't assume I speak for anyone but myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.''
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature