Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]

To: Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>
Cc: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 22:29:58 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040523022958.GA7951@scowler.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0405230307090.28667-100000@hal.pp.fishpool.fi>
References: <[🔎] 1085270139.15530.1.camel@seb128> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0405230307090.28667-100000@hal.pp.fishpool.fi>

> Seb: I realize you're anxious to get GNOME 2.6 into unstable, but Rhythmbox
> proved that you want to go too far too fast.  Soon, but not now.

Sounds more like someone wants him to go too slow.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

References:
- Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
  - From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
- Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
  - From: Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
Next by Date: Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
Previous by thread: Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
Next by thread: Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread