[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ...



On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 12:09:37PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:30:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > > * gnutls 7->10 transition
> > > The transition has been made in experimental for cups, gnome and related
> > > packages.
> > 
> > Hrm; is this going to screw up d-i?

> debootstrap already installs libgnutls10 on sarge and sid, so it should
> be fine.

Not only that, but the fact that libldap2 has switched to gnutls10
already causes serious problems for packages using both ldap and cups
right now.

> > > Is there anything else expected from the release team for Gnome2.6
> > > before the upload to unstable or are we ok now ? 

> > I can't think of anything. Jeff? Colin? Steve? Joey? Any obvious reasons
> > left why the Gnome 2.6 debs are definitely not ready for consumption yet?

> Nothing from me ...

Nor me.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: