Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ...
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:29:06PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > * tests
> >
> > Some upgrade tests from "gnome 2.4.1 sarge" to "gnome 2.6 experimental"
> > have been successfully made. Upgrades from unstable to experimental have
> > been tested too with success.
> >
> > Is there anything else expected from the release team for Gnome2.6
> > before the upload to unstable or are we ok now ?
>
> What about upgrades gnome woody -> gnome 2.6? Seems to me that this is
> the most important upgrade to test.
>
> Of course it's totally optional, but you could also try whether some of
> the common gnome backports upgrade well, maybe there are only
> easy-to-solve issues.
just my curiosity, which kind of RC bugs can arise from failing upgrades?
dom
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
Reply to: