Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:45:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 04:13:22PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>> > What about setting up a parallel autobuilder chain for experimental,
>> Sure, that'd be great.
> Although not easy. I'm not sure about this (haven't done any
> experiments, maybe I should), but I suspect wanna-build does not handle
> incomplete distributions (as experimental is one) very well.
>
> Also, experimental is very likely to break, meaning, an experimental
> buildd will require a lot more maintenance than an unstable one (not a
> showstopper, but still an issue)
OTOH, an experimental buildd doesn't need to build as many packages as
an unstable one. Looking at the quality of most experimental packages
(GNOME 2.6, as example) and the number of FTBFS bugs in unstable, i'd
suspect that there is no big difference.
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # <mailto:marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
Attachment:
pgprqYAVKaXdb.pgp
Description: PGP signature