[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Removing zope



Gregor Hoffleit writes:
> * Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> [040403 12:25]:
> > Steve Langasek writes:
> > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 09:34:18PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 05:33:57AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > > > For zope to be removed, one must also do this:
> > > > > remove zope-textindexng2/2.05-1
> > > > > remove zope-zpatterns/0.4.3p2-17
> > > 
> > > > Cc'ing the maintainers of those packages, as they have an obvious vested
> > > > interest in keeping zope from being removed from sarge.  Any takers for
> > > > NMU'ing (or MU'ing) zope to get these RC bugs fixed?  Time is short.
> > > 
> > > .... also cc:ing the maintainers of the various other zope packages that
> > > are arch: all, and would also have to be removed in order for zope to be
> > > removed from testing.
> > > 
> > > The total list of packages that must be removed if zope is not
> > > releasable with sarge is as follows:
> > > 
> > > plone
> > > python-extclass
> > > qmtest
> > 
> > The zope maintainers seem to be quiet ... Please before removing
> > qmtest, let me separate out the python-extclass package from the zope
> > package.
> 
> No reaction from Luca indeed, but Andrea is suggesting to upgrade to his
> 2.7.0-13 package. During the next week, I'll try and see if that sounds
> possible and feasable without breaking to much other packages. Fixing
> the grave bugs in 2.6.4 doesn't look impossible, but then, I really
> don't like to mess with Luca's zopectl code...

that would be great, to have plone-2.0 in sarge ...



Reply to: