[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#236554: Postgresql does not depend on libkrb5-17-heimdal but it is needed for upgrades



severity 236554 important
thanks

Hi Steve, hi Oliver, hi d-release!

On 2004-03-17 16:08 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi Steve, hi Oliver!
> 
> On 2004-03-17  0:43 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I question whether this bug should really be considered RC.  The binary
> > that fails comes from the old version of the package, which did have
> > correct dependencies on libkrb5-17-heimdal; and the database
> > dump/restore is normally done as part of the upgrade, AIUI; so this
> > really ought to only fail if something else forced the removal of the
> > already-installed libkrb5-17-heimdal package at the time of upgrade, and
> > I can't see any conflicts in the archive that would do this.
> > 
> > IMHO, this bug ought to be considered "important", not "serious".
> 
> Oliver planned to upload a new version into woody-proposed-updates
> which will also save all depended-on libraries. This will ensure a
> clean upgrade to Sarge and help the situation a litte. However, the
> submitter of this report tried to upgrade from the current testing
> version (7.3.x) which broke. I would agree to your proposal: Oliver
> uploads a new stable version and we downgrade to important. Oliver,
> what do you say?

libxml2 will go into testing tomorrow (or the day after); then this RC
bug will be the only thing blocking postgresql and some 30
depending packages from testing.

This bug affects only a small fraction of testing users (it does not
really affect the sid version) and Oliver will prepare an updated
woody version (which will prevent missing libraries, thus
straightening the upgrade path from woody). According to the
discussion partly quoted above I'm downgrading this bug to important
now.

I'm CC'ing this to -release for some feedback. If somebody objects to
this downgrade, then please upgrade the bug to RC again; you have time
for this until libxml2 enters testing.

Thank you for considering and for any comments, and have a nice weekend!

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                 Debian GNU/Linux Developer
martin@piware.de                      mpitt@debian.org
http://www.piware.de             http://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: