Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

To: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Cc: Richard.Kreckel@ginac.de, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:19:18 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20041203101918.GU31450@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>, Richard.Kreckel@ginac.de, debian-release@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20041203045438.GA26902@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0412022254210.26250-100000@higgs.physik.uni-mainz.de> <[🔎] 20041203045438.GA26902@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>

Hi,

* Dirk Eddelbuettel (edd@debian.org) [041203 06:15]:
> I think Richard is basically correct in his analysis. Bjorn's page lists
> 
>   octave2.1
>   octave-forge
>   octave-sp     [ source package semidef-oct ]
> 
> as mutually blocking themselves on Alpha -- but buildd.debian.org shows that
> all packages have built correctly.

I added an easy hint. Thanks for drawing our attention on it.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?
Next by Date: Re: Please approve base-files_3.1.0 for sarge
Previous by thread: Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?
Next by thread: Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread