[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

How bad is a wrong recommends? (was: Bug#273734: education-common: con't fulfill the Recommends on !i386)



* Adrian Bunk (adrian.bunk@stusta.de) [041003 17:10]:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 12:44:21PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:

> > You certainly have a good point here.  I'm not suggesting to remove
> > Recommends; I think the concept of Recommends is good.  However, there
> > is also a difference between Depends and Recommends.  I think what I'd
> > like to see is:
> > 
> > Depends -> grave bug
> > Recommends -> normal (or important) bug
> > Suggests -> minor
> > 
> > Recommends is stronger than Suggests but it doesn't completely break
> > the package so imho it shouldn't be RC.

> It depends on how strong you expect a Recommends to be. My impression 
> was, it's a "install the recommended package unless you really know what 
> you are doing".
> 
> And it's currently supported that in order to aid users a package 
> management tool might handle recommends like dependencies. If this 
> should continue to be supported, they have to be treated the same way.

I agree here. However, if the RMs also agree. a (RC-)policy
clarification would be a nice thing to do.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C



Reply to: