On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:12:15PM +0200, Tobias Stefan Richter wrote: > >> > pavuk (unfixed; bug #264684) for DSA-527 > > > >> pavuk 0.9pl28-3 fixed that. #264684 is left open only for the other > >> security hole mentioned there. We might need a DSA for that hole.. > >> I'm not explicitly tracking it since it already has an RC bug. > > > > Package is in a weird state in the archive (binaries but no sources); > > requires an ftpmaster to look at it, preferably for removal from sarge. > > > [...] > >> rlpr (unfixed; bug #255402) for DSA-524 > > rlpr is in the same state as pavuk above. > I didn't look into pavuk, but rlpr has as far as I see no weird state. You seem to be right, though previous attempts to cleanly remove this package from testing had failed. > The latest Debian version is from the above DSA (2.02-7woody1), which > could savely be included in sarge. Upstream has 2.05, though. > I would not like to see it removed. Are you willing to maintain the package yourself? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature