[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#263019: This bug is definitely RC

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:26:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> severity 263019 minor
> thanks
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > severity 263019 grave
> > thanks
> > 
> > If gcc-3.4 requires binutils (>= 2.15) the dependencies need an update.
> you didn't give any reason. downgrading.
> 	Matthias

Uhm. Failing to have correct versions in depends (*if* they're really that
sensitive) is mroe or less an automatic FTBFS, which is at least 'serious',
I should think. Certainly not minor.

If it doesn't actually require binutils >= 2.15, then the bug should be
updated; if it does, an RC severity is correct, I should think.

The reason seems adequite to me; it's only the correctness which I can't
verify just offhand.
Joel Baker <fenton@debian.org>                                        ,''`.
Debian GNU/kNetBSD(i386) porter                                      : :' :
                                                                     `. `'
http://nienna.lightbearer.com/                                         `-

Attachment: pgpag0J4R8LkY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: