Fixes in zopectl Re: Removing zope
- To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Cc: Gregor Hoffleit <gregor@hoffleit.de>, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org, "James W. Penny" <jpenny@debian.org>, Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, Jonas Meurer <mejo@debian.org>, Nicolas Ledez <nledez@virtual-net.fr>, Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>, Federico Di Gregorio <fog@debian.org>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@free.net.ph>, Igor Stroh <stroh@scan-plus.de>
- Subject: Fixes in zopectl Re: Removing zope
- From: David Coe <david@someotherplace.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 11:55:18 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 86k70xxaq1.fsf_-_@someotherplace.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 16494.38204.342130.581069@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Matthias Klose's message of "Sat, 3 Apr 2004 12:43:08 +0200")
- References: <20040329103357.GA6483@twcny.rr.com> <20040401033417.GD28617@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net> <20040401034445.GE28617@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net> <[🔎] 16494.36963.286761.984351@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <[🔎] 20040403103743.GN15623@sam.mediasupervision.de> <[🔎] 16494.38204.342130.581069@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> Gregor Hoffleit writes:
>> * Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> [040403 12:25]:
>> > Steve Langasek writes:
>> >
>> > The zope maintainers seem to be quiet ... Please before removing
>> > qmtest, let me separate out the python-extclass package from the zope
>> > package.
>>
>> No reaction from Luca indeed, but Andrea is suggesting to upgrade to his
>> 2.7.0-13 package. During the next week, I'll try and see if that sounds
>> possible and feasable without breaking to much other packages. Fixing
>> the grave bugs in 2.6.4 doesn't look impossible, but then, I really
>> don't like to mess with Luca's zopectl code...
>
> that would be great, to have plone-2.0 in sarge ...
That's a great idea, though plone 2.0 doesn't actually *need* zope 2.7
(it works with 2.6 as well).
I'm fixing the remaining zope 'grave' bugs, all with small changes in
zopectl. I'll NMU it tonight, I believe.
QUESTION: is an NMU to unstable with priority high sufficient to get
this into testing, or do I have to upload to testing-proposed-updates
(or someplace else) as well?
Reply to: