Re: NMU sysklogd and/or switch to different system logger?

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: NMU sysklogd and/or switch to different system logger?
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:10:47 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040331171047.GA31107@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040331162949.GK1655@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
References: <[🔎] 20040329103734.GA6496@twcny.rr.com> <[🔎] 20040331162949.GK1655@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>

* Martin Schulze (joey@infodrom.org) [040331 19:10]:
> Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > sysklogd has two annoyingly-long-open patched RC bugs.
> > (syslog-ng, for example, doesn't.)
> > 
> > sysklogd's maintainer (Martin Schulze) is presumably too busy to deal with
> > it, or something.  Either sysklogd should be NMUed, or a different
> > syslog package should be the default for sarge.  Thoughts?

> Does a MU fit as well?

MUs are always best, if they're available.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

References:
- NMU sysklogd and/or switch to different system logger?
  - From: neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)
- Re: NMU sysklogd and/or switch to different system logger?
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>

Prev by Date: Re: NMU sysklogd and/or switch to different system logger?
Next by Date: Debian, need drugs?
Previous by thread: Re: NMU sysklogd and/or switch to different system logger?
Next by thread: Re: NMU sysklogd and/or switch to different system logger?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread