Re: accepted: $package/$arch
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:47:20PM +0100, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> > > What exactly does the /$arch suffix mean in update_output.txt?
> > That binaries on that specific arch have been updated. The suffix is also
> > used in update_excuses.
> Were those packages already in testing, with the same version, and
> just the binaries for that particular architecture were updated? What
> triggers this?
The source was in testing, at the same version as the binaries claim
as their source; but the binaries in testing didn't match the binaries
in unstable.
It happens when testing has old binaries for that package on that arch,
when an arch-specific binary recompile happens on the arch (binNMU),
and when debs get removed on an arch in unstable, without their source
getting removed too.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Reply to: