On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 18:12, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I'm going to tackle a couple of the low-hanging RC bugs tonight and > tomorrow (MIPS msq, Sparc kernel warning, something else I've forgotten). > After that I believe the packages are ready to leave experimental. They'll > probably need some TLC in unstable, but that has to happen eventually if > they're to make sarge. These packages do bump the shlib dependency, so > backing down will be messy. > Does anyone else have issues that we need to address before they enter > unstable? If so, _please_ let me know in the next day or two. Otherwise we > should freeze CVS on (let's say) Tuesday, build and test 2.3.2.ds1-8 on as > many architectures as possible, and upload probably straight into unstable. Java works, but Citrix doesn't with the -6 debs. I'm going to start work on hunting that down Monday. I'll try and get my Sparc resurrected before then. I'll also try to ia64/nptl in before then too. Did we ever hear back from James about m68k? -- In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn't been misused by the very people entrusted with keeping its information safe. - Bruce Schneier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part