[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Remove c2man from testing

On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 19:13:44 +0900, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> said: 

>> Package: c2man Testing: 2.41-16 Unstable: 2.41-16 Suggestion:
>> remove-from-testing remove-from-unstable Analysis: c2man has been
>> dead upstream for years (which was, so far, not a problem), and
>> does not work with modern C/C++ programs -- which _is_ a
>> problem. The functionality has been superseded with packages like
>> doxygen; it has been requested that c2man be removed from Sid.
>> (Grave Bug#192016)

> Yikes.

> I grepped Sources.gz for c2man, and there are three.

> dmachinemon, libvformat wine

	Are they really using c2man? I could reverse the d3ecision to
 drop c2man, and just orphan it (the bug that broke the camels back
 was originally of severity important). c2man has indeed been dead for
 years, and I don't think it is worth the effort to fix the problems.

Steele's Law: There exist tasks which cannot be done by more than ten
men or fewer than one hundred.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: