Re: Better RC Bug Count
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:56:46PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> I've been thinking (always a dangerous proposition, i know :) -- we
> need a better bug list. The current RC bug list includes things like
> bugs that are tagged Stable or Sid, that don't really apply to the
> current release-to-be. Also, it doesn't make sense to include bugs
> against packages that have been removed from testing.
> I think this could help to better direct people who are interested in
> getting sarge out the door. Does anyone else think this is a good idea?
> Also, how hard would it be to implement this?
The woody and sid tags are represented by the optional second 
list on the RC bug listing:
S == woody
T == sarge
U == sid
Determining which packages have been removed from testing is