Re: Bug#155374: Where are Installation Manual and Release Notes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 01:31:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 02:13:04PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Is there any reason that install-doc shouldn't be removed from
> > > unstable and/or testing, if it's not going to be used for
> > > debian-installer?
> >
> > The package is useless as it is so nobody would shed a tear for it,
> > but I don't know if there are any repercussions (or if it's against
> > the etiquette) if you ditch a binary package but don't adjust the
> > source package it originates from...
>
> The same reasons to remove install-doc would apply to the whole
> boot-floppies source package, wouldn't they?
PMJI, but what if the SRM does another point release of woody? Wouldn't
install-doc and boot-floppies be kinda necessary?
Joe Nahmias, d-t tester-at-large, DD wannabe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+vn0yKl23+OYWEqURAg93AJ4wT69VS/MNVJZAAPa/toMnXME+XACdGcVw
y/oOKVbMDZgY5Yaz8yDYZLg=
=KBZ6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: