Re: To Do for 2.2r3
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
>
> > * libc6 -18 for alpha, arm, i386, powerpc (already there for m68k
> > and sparc)
> >
> > * updated kernel / pcmcia stuff?
> >
> > * updated boot-floppies?
>
> Joey (Martin Schulz) seems to think the boot-floppies 2.2.21 don't
Next time s/Schulz/Schulze/ please.
> have the testing to go into 2.2r3. I rather disagree, but it's you
> guys' call about that.
I guess you got me wrong. I had my reservations because boot-floppies
doesn't seem to be available for a while and thus are not very well
tested, no?
Since r1 or r2 got quite some improvements for boot-floppies, even
from me personally, I guess that I shouldn't hesitate that much...
If you say bf are suited for stable and aj agrees (which he does)
I'm fine with it as well.
> - dbootstrap:
> when we ask for the Debian CD-ROM, ask specifically for the *first*
> CD-ROM; ask fewer questions about archive locations, in fact, no
> questions in the cases that some is using a media where things are
> where we can find them (closes: Bug#82912) the "load modules from
> floppy" step was reworded a bit to make it more clear that this an
> extra, non-std thing
documentation is updated already?
Regards,
Joey
--
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.
Reply to: