Re: Current 2.2r2 status
- To: m68k-build@nocrew.org
- Cc: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>, Philip Blundell <pb@debian.org>, Dan Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>, Roman Hodek <roman@debian.org>, Christopher Chimelis <chris@debian.org>, Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>, Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Current 2.2r2 status
- From: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:24:14 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20001122132413.D486@ap031.experimentalphysik.uni-kiel.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.10011221243280.8432-100000@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>; from schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de on Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 12:48:34PM +0100
- References: <[🔎] 20001122033241.A3866@debian.org> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.10011221243280.8432-100000@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 12:48:34PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > [m68k] no 2.2.18 yet, maybe we will have a new set of 2.2.10 kernels, but
> > they should be tested a little by our users. We might build 2.2.16 or
> > 17 kernels, but I think there is not enough time to test this.
>
> 2.2.16 is known to not boot on a variety of Macs, please stick with 2.2.10
> or get the lame Mac crew to fix this.
> ETA for just testing 2.2.16 on Atari and (one) Mac: not under a week.
sure.
> > 2.2.10 should be ready tomorrow, Nick already built a kernel-patch,
> > but we will not upload this before its tested.
>
> Is the atyfb code from Petr Stehlik in that patch? I know I promised to
> take care of it but didn't get around to it yet, maybe Nick picked up the
> patch?
2.2.10-9: Added atyfb patch
See http://people.debian.org/~holgate/kernel-2.2.10/
Do I have to active ATIFB now on Atari? Duh...
Christian
--
First they ignore you. Then they laugh about you. Then they fight you.
And then you win. [Mahatma Gandhi]
Reply to: