Re: Package pools, testing, 2.2r2
Anthony Towns wrote:
> For those who're interested: we'll see about handling 2.2r2 in a more
> transparent manner. I'll try to keep auric:~ajt/which-updates as an up
> to date list of which will get accepted and why others will get rejected,
> and have it posted automatically to -release once a week. Comments etc
> should go to -release.
It might be nice if, once we get package pools, we can break off a
pre-r2 branch that just gets the updates put in it as you clear
them. Then it could even be tested a bit and it would be quite obvious
what was going in.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: