Re: Definitive package list for 2.1r5...
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Vincent Renardias wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 21, Vincent Renardias <vincent@ldsol.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > [Vincent 2000/01/18]
> > > > package : mutt
> > > > version : 1.0.0-3.1
> > > > architectures: i386 (ALPHA, SPARC & M68K MISSING!!!!)
> > > > issue : Y2K fix
> > > PLEASE REMOVE THIS PACKAGE! mutt 1.0.0 is not suitable for slink and the
> > > fix is not critical enough to justify the time I would need to backport
> > > the whole package.
> >
> > Huh? what in mutt-1.0.0 makes it improper for use in slink?
> > (this package has been recompiled with slink libraries, if it's what that
> > makes you worry...)
>
> Is mutt_dotlock back on board? In former times it was missing, making
> the package entirely unusable for reading mail.
Yes, I recompiled it:
# dpkg -c
/mirror/debian/dists/slink-proposed-updates/mutt_1.0.0-3.1_i386.deb | grep lock
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 7864 2000-01-17 14:58 usr/bin/mutt_dotlock
-rw-r--r-- root/root 1773 2000-01-17 14:58 usr/man/man1/mutt_dotlock.1.gz
#
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS vincent@{{ldsol,pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: GNOME : -
- http://www.fr.debian.org http://www.gnome.org -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Every man has two nations, and one of them is France" [Benjamin Franklin]
Reply to: