Re: potato kernels and debian-cd

[Daniel Barclay <dsb@smart.net>]

> From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
...
>
> At 21:18 +1000 2000-04-23, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> kernel-image-2.0.36_2.0.36-3.deb                ????
> >> kernel-image-2.0.38_2.0.38-3.deb                ????
> >> kernel-image-2.2.10_2.2.10-1.deb                ????
> >> kernel-image-2.2.12_2.2.12-4.deb                ????
> >> kernel-image-2.2.13_2.2.13-2.deb                ????
> >> kernel-image-2.2.14-ide_2.2.14-4.deb            conflicts w/ 2.2.14
> >> kernel-image-2.2.14-idepci_2.2.14-1.deb         conflicts w/ 2.2.14
> >> kernel-image-2.2.14_2.2.14-4.deb                conflucts w/ 2.2.14-ide
> >
> >2.0.36/2.2.10/2.2.12/2.2.13 should all be removed.
> 
> I don't think we should have any 2.0 kernel binary in potato.

If 2.0.38 is kept, make sure it has the IDE disk corruption patch
(2.0.38pre1.ide.patch.gz, if that's not something already in 2.0.38).


Daniel
-- 
Daniel Barclay
dsb@smart.net
(Hmm.  A little worrisome:  http://www.junkbusters.com/cgi-bin/privacy
                            http://www.anonymizer.com/snoop.cgi )