[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#56059: Definitive package list for 2.1r5...

Hmm.  The distribution list seems a bit excessive, since this build
problem is with the slink NMU version only.  The debian/rules in
versions 1.7 and later don't have the problem.  Since my development
system is now potato, a second NMU to fix the rules problem would be
fine with me.  Then, feel free to close the bug.

On a related matter: adjtimex version 1.8 in frozen still has the Y2K
bug.  My upload of 1.9 (on January 3) sat in Incoming over two weeks,
then disappeared without a trace.  I've written ftpmaster@debian.org
about that.

	       - Jim Van Zandt

>Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:39:12 +0100 (MET)
>From: Roman Hodek <Roman.Hodek@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
>Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org,
>        56059@bugs.debian.org
>> which version of adjtimex are you talking about?
>-2.1, same as you. debian/rules does the following:
>	debstd README debian/README.debian
>	mv debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/adjtimex/* debian/tmp/usr/doc/adjtimex/
>	rm -r debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/
>	mv debian/tmp/usr/share/man debian/tmp/usr/man
>i.e. it expects that debstd installs docs and man pages to
>/usr/share/{doc,man} and moves them back to /usr/{doc,man}. However,
>the debstd in slink installs the files into /usr in first place so
>that the action isn't necessary.
>Probably this is a portable solution (for both debstd versions):
>	debstd README debian/README.debian
>	if [ -d debian/tmp/usr/share/doc ]; then \
>		mv debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/adjtimex/* debian/tmp/usr/doc/adjtimex/; \
>		rm -r debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/; \
>	fi
>	if [ -d debian/tmp/usr/share/man ]; then \
>		mv debian/tmp/usr/share/man debian/tmp/usr/man; \
>	fi
>i.e. move the files/dirs only if they're in /usr/share.

Reply to: