Re: stable with 2.2.11 (was Re: Stable release management)
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Christian Meder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 03:26:37PM +0000, Vincent Renardias wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > > I agree -- it's fine to upgrade to kernel 2.2.x in slink, but
> > > upgrading libc is just too much of a radical step. Lets do it one
> > > step at a time, ok?
> >
> > yep. linux 2.2 is a very much needed upgrade. glibc2.1 certainly isn't.
>
> I'm not sure if you're aware that we were speaking about upgrading
> glibc for the sparc architecture only. Debian slink Sparc is already based
> on a recent prerelease of glibc2.1 so upgrading is just a minor glibc
> update.
ok, if slink/sparc is already glibc2.1 based, then upgrading is not really
a problem... sorry for missing this point.
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS vincent@{{ldsol,pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: http://www.openhardware.org Executive Linux: -
- http://www.fr.debian.org Open Hardware: http://www.exelinux.com -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-"Microsoft est à l'informatique ce que le grumeau est à la crêpe..." -
Reply to: