Re: "priority: required" packages which shouldn't be
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 09:25:16PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 02:14:50PM -0600 , Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > It is a release critical bug that the following packages have priority
> > "Required", as far as I know:
> > libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
> > obsoleted by libstdc++2.9
> shouldn't that be libstdc++2.10 ?
Obsolete by both, yes. In fact, libstdc++2.9 *and* libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
are both obsolete, you are correct.
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>